![]() |
![]() |
Nature 424, 299 - 302 (17 July 2003); doi:10.1038/nature01778 |
|
D. BAUCH*, K. DARLING, J. SIMSTICH*, H.A. BAUCH*, H. ERLENKEUSER§ & D. KROON
The shells of the planktonic foraminifer Neogloboquadrina pachyderma have become a classical tool for reconstructing glacialinterglacial climate conditions in the North Atlantic Ocean1-3. Palaeoceanographers utilize its left- and right-coiling variants, which exhibit a distinctive reciprocal temperature and water mass related shift in faunal abundance both at present and in late Quaternary sediments1, 2, 4, 5. Recently discovered cryptic genetic diversity in planktonic foraminifers6-8 now poses significant questions for these studies. Here we report genetic evidence demonstrating that the apparent 'single species' shell-based records of right-coiling N. pachyderma used in palaeoceanographic reconstructions contain an alternation in species as environmental factors change. This is reflected in a species-dependent incremental shift in right-coiling N. pachyderma shell calcite 18O between the Last Glacial Maximum and full Holocene conditions. Guided by the percentage dextral coiling ratio, our findings enhance the use of
18O records of right-coiling N. pachyderma for future study. They also highlight the need to genetically investigate other important morphospecies to refine their accuracy and reliability as palaeoceanographic proxies.
Morphological distinction provides the main basis for foraminiferal counts and derived palaeoceanographic reconstructions2, 9, 10, and yet the genus Neogloboquadrina is known to be a rather variable morphogroup5, 11-14. Although lack of DNA in fossil foraminiferal shells precludes genetic investigation, molecular analyses of the living N. pachyderma planktonic assemblages now provide the opportunity to resolve much of this confusion. The left-coiling ('sin.') form of the morphospecies N. pachyderma is the dominant morphotype today in the cold, high-northern latitudes15, 16 (Fig. 1a). Although right-coiling ('dex.') N. pachyderma is found in more temperate environments than its left-coiled counterpart (Fig. 1a), a small percentage of N. pachyderma (dex.) persists in sedimentary records, even in regions with extreme polar conditions such as the central Arctic Ocean17. It is unknown whether these N. pachyderma (dex.) represent sporadic hydrographic change, expatriation from their more-temperate water mass, or whether they are aberrant forms of the left-coiling variety. Recently, the 18O signature in N. pachyderma (dex.) has been proposed as a good recorder of glacialinterglacial sea surface temperatures18-20. Our molecular work now questions such continuous 'single species' use of the N. pachyderma (dex.)
18O record for past climate reconstruction. We have investigated this species-versus-morphology issue by comparing the genotypic identity of N. pachyderma (sin. and dex.) collected from the Nordic seas surface waters against a background of N. pachyderma
18O values and coiling ratios from the equivalent regional surface sediments. We then demonstrate the palaeoceanographic application of this relationship down-core.
Figure 1
Spatial distributions of coiling ratios and isotopic differences.
Full legend
High resolution image and legend (104k)
The general modern hydrography of the Nordic seas is reflected in the stable oxygen isotope values of both N. pachyderma (sin.) and N. pachyderma (dex.)21, since the 18O incorporated into test calcite is a function of temperature and salinity22. The
18O values of N. pachyderma (sin.) and N. pachyderma (dex.) are largely identical under polar conditions (Fig. 1b) in the western region, where relative abundances of N. pachyderma (dex.) are low (Fig. 1a). But in the east and south of the Nordic seas, where the percentage of N. pachyderma (dex.) increases rapidly under more-temperate conditions (Fig. 1a), a significant isotopic difference between left- and right-coiling N. pachyderma of up to about 1
in
18O is observed (Fig. 1b).
Molecular analysis of the small subunit (SSU) ribosomal RNA sequences has previously shown that the N. pachyderma morphospecies consists of a complex of distinct genotypes7, and that the coiling direction in the Southern Hemisphere is not a phenotypic response to temperature, but reflects genetic divergence and the probable existence of two separate species7. In this study (Fig. 2), we have found that throughout the Nordic seas, all left-coiling N. pachyderma are genotypically [Type I (sin.)]. This is not the case for N. pachyderma (dex.). In the region of the Norwegian Sea and Denmark Strait south of 64° N (Fig. 2), all N. pachyderma (dex.) are genotypically [Type I (dex.)] and are genetically highly distinct from the left-coiling variant7. Under polar conditions north of the latitude 70° N where the coiling ratios are confined to less than 5% (Fig. 1a) and the 18O values of N. pachyderma (sin.) and N. pachyderma (dex.) are largely the same (Fig. 1b), genotyping reveals that the left- and right-coiling variants of N. pachyderma are genotypically identical. Both are [Type I (sin.)]. Clearly, N. pachyderma [Type I (dex.)] is thriving in the relatively warm North Atlantic waters, and is adapted to a totally different hydrographic regime than left- and right-coiling [Type I (sin.)], which is dominant in polar waters. Such genetic and environmental evidence indicates that these two genetic types should be considered different species. As might be expected, there is a mixing zone between the right- and left-coiling provinces (70° N to 64° N) where the dextral morphotypes can be either N. pachyderma [Type I (dex.)] or [Type I (sin.)].
![]() |
Figure 2
Geographical distribution of genotypes of left-coiling N. pachyderma [Type I (sin.)], the right-coiling form of N. pachyderma [Type I (sin.)], and right-coiling N. pachyderma [Type I (dex.)].
Full legend High resolution image and legend (66k) |
The genetic evidence for N. pachyderma shows that the morphological distinction of coiling directions is not sufficient to distinguish between genotypes. Since fossil specimens do not contain DNA for genetic analysis, we need an indicator proxy to distinguish between the two species of right-coiling N. pachyderma. From the presented sediment data in combination with the genetic evidence it can be assumed that in regions where the percentage of N. pachyderma (dex.) does not exceed a 'threshold' value of 5% in coiling direction, both N. pachyderma coiling variants will be identical, genotypically [Type I (sin.)], with a correspondingly identical isotopic composition. In regions where the percentage of N. pachyderma (dex.) exceeds this 'threshold' value, N. pachyderma (dex.) is expected to have a progressively different isotopic composition from N. pachyderma (sin.) as the N. pachyderma [Type I (dex.)] genotype increasingly dominates the assemblage.
In order to further test our conclusions from the modern data set, we investigated two sediment cores representing the warmer and colder regions of the Norwegian Sea (see Fig. 1 for locations). Samples from the glacial sections of the two cores show a low relative abundance (15%) of N. pachyderma (dex.) (Fig. 3). Since the early Holocene (910 kyr ago), dextral coiling ratios are higher, with levels of 510% in core PS1243 and 4060% in core M23323 due to climate warming at the end of the deglaciation. These faunal differences reflect the basic water-mass temperature gradient between the two sites. A similar picture is recognized in the stable oxygen isotope records of N. pachyderma (sin.) and N. pachyderma (dex.), which both depict the overall climatic change since the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) (Fig. 3). However, while
18O in both species are nearly the same during the glacial sections, when dextral coiling ratios are extremely low, a systematic offset of about 0.5
is noted since about 10 kyr ago when dextral coiling ratios increase, accompanied by a decrease in the relative abundance of N. pachyderma (sin.) (Fig. 3). In light of the genotype evidence for the Nordic seas, this Holocene offset in
18O has to be interpreted as an alternation in the species of N. pachyderma (dex.) from [Type I (sin.)] during glacial times to a [Type I (dex.)] domination in the interglacial interval. The isotopic offset of about 0.5
diminishes in core PS1243 since about 4 kyr ago, and corresponds to a period of increasing abundance of N. pachyderma (sin.) and a coeval abundance decrease of N. pachyderma (dex.) fairly close to the threshold value of
5% coiling ratio. This would result in a greater contribution of the right-coiling [Type I (sin.)] genotype to the
18O signal during this time in core PS1243, and explains the reduced offset in
18O between N. pachyderma (sin.) and N. pachyderma (dex.) compared to that of core M23323. Altogether this strongly supports our conclusion that a species-dependent isotopic shift in N. pachyderma (dex.)
18O signal can be inferred when relative abundances of N. pachyderma (dex.) cross a specific threshold value of
5%.
![]() |
Figure 3
Time series showing climate proxies of two sediment cores versus depth and versus calendar years.
Full legend High resolution image and legend (87k) |
The 18O isotopic difference of 0.5
between the right-coiling forms of N. pachyderma [Type I (sin.)] and N. pachyderma [Type I (dex.)] in the Holocene translates into a temperature or salinity difference of approximately 2 °C or 2 practical salinity units, respectively. This isotopic difference is an additional increment, superimposed upon the global LGM/Holocene isotopic signature. For all future palaeoceanographic
18O isotope studies carried out on N. pachyderma (dex.) at low percentage coiling ratios in the Northern Hemisphere, it will be of considerable importance to account for this derived species dependent isotopic shift of up to
0.5
. Interestingly, while the
18O values reveal such a marked difference during the Holocene, there is no systematic offset in
13C between N. pachyderma (sin.) and N. pachyderma (dex.) over the entire time interval (Fig. 3). Since
13C values of foraminifers are thought to record specific environmental conditions23, 24, the Holocene
18O offset may represent a genotype-specific vital effect. However, we have shown that N. pachyderma [Type I (sin.)] and N. pachyderma [Type I (dex.)] are clearly adapted to different hydrographic regimes, and it remains to be determined whether the species-dependent
18O offset represents annual, seasonal or water-depth hydrological differences, a vital effect or a combination of them. Although our findings add yet another aspect to the interpretation of
18O values of planktonic foraminifers in the Northern Hemisphere, by using the indicator proxy of the coiling ratio, the correct interpretation can be deduced. Clearly the relevance of coiling ratios for isotope records of N. pachyderma (dex.) in other palaeoceanographically important regions needs to be addressed.
There is accumulating evidence that several morphospecies do not represent genetically continuous species over their entire environmental adaptive range, as newly discovered potential 'cryptic species' seem to have different environmental preferences6-8, 25. Isotopic differences may also be associated with other genotypes of morphospecies commonly used in palaeoceanographic reconstructions26, 27. An understanding of the nature of these adaptations will considerably enhance other palaeoceanographic and palaeoclimate proxies if the 'cryptic species' can be distinguished in the fossil record, as was possible for this study.
Methods
Foraminiferal counts In down-core sediment samples about 300 individuals of the size fraction >125 µm have been counted, while in surface sediment samples individuals >150 µm have been counted10. Comparison of counting results of these different size classes in the Nordic seas has shown that there is no significant difference in relative faunal abundances and thereby also coiling ratios28. In the N. pachyderma (sin.) dominated polar regions, typical coiling ratios of N. pachyderma (dex.) are between 1% and 5 1% from counts of 300 individuals10. The upper value of 5% coiling ratio has been adopted as the threshold value for the start of the influx of N. pachyderma [Type I (dex.)] into the N. pachyderma [Type I (sin.)] fossil assemblage. This threshold conforms to the upper values observed in the polar-region core tops (Fig.1a), the glacial down-core sediments (Fig. 3), and is also approximately the threshold observed in core PS1243 at which the isotopic offset is observed to decrease in the later Holocene (Fig.3).
Isotope analysis of calcite shells About 2030 individuals were picked from the 125250 µm size fraction, and analysed at the Leibniz Laboratory of Kiel University using a fully automated Kiel Device plus MAT 251 isotope mass spectrometer system. Results are reported in the usual -notation relative to PDB, and have an accuracy of 0.07
and 0.04
for
18O and
13C, respectively.
Sampling localities Foraminifera were collected on board RV Polarstern (ARKXV/1 + 2); specimens were obtained using multinets (upper 500 m) at 75° N (from 13° W to 13° E), and from a mixture of multinet and surface pumped water samples in the Nordic seas between 80° N and 60° N.
Isolation and sequencing of SSU gene fragments DNA extraction, amplification by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and automated sequencing of either a 500-base-pair (bp) or a
1,000-bp region of the terminal 3' end of the foraminiferal SSU rRNA gene was as described previously7, 8. The gene fragments for N. pachyderma (dex.) were directly sequenced. Some limited degree of ambiguity was detected in the gene repeats for N. pachyderma (sin.), and consensus sequences were obtained by cloning using a pCR 2.1 TOPO TA cloning kit (Invitrogen) and then sequencing using universal primers.
Received 6 March 2003;accepted 20 May 2003
1. | Ericson, D. B. Coiling direction of Globigerina pachyderma as a climatic index. Science 130, 219220 (1959) | ISI | |
2. | CLIMAP Project Members The surface of the ice-age Earth. Science 191, 11311137 (1976) | ISI | |
3. | Bond, G. C., Broecker, W., Johnsen, S. & McManus, J. Correlations between climate records from North Atlantic sediments and Greenland ice. Nature 365, 143147 (1993) | Article | ISI | |
4. | Bé, A. W. & Tolderlund, D. S. in The Micropaleontology of the Oceans (eds Funnel, B. M. & Riedel, W. R.) 105149 (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1971) |
5. | Bandy, O. L. Origin and development of Globorotalia (Turborotalia) pachyderma (Ehrenberg). Micropaleontology 18, 294318 (1972) |
6. | de Vargas, C., Norris, R., Zaninetti, L., Gibb, S. W. & Pawlowski, J. Molecular evidence of cryptic speciation in planktonic foraminifers and their relation to oceanic provinces. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 28642868 (1999) | Article | PubMed | ChemPort | |
7. | Darling, K. F. et al. Molecular evidence for genetic mixing of Arctic and Antarctic subpolar populations of planktonic foraminifers. Nature 404, 4347 (2000) | Article | |
8. | Stewart, I. A., Darling, K. F., Kroon, D., Wade, C. M. & Troelstra, S. R. Genotypic variability in subarctic Atlantic planktic foraminifera. Mar. Micropaleontol. 43, 143153 (2001) | Article | ISI | |
9. | Kipp, N. G. New transfer function for estimating past sea-surface conditions from sea-bed distribution of planktonic foraminiferal assemblages in the North Atlantic. Geol. Soc. Mem. 145, 341 (1976) |
10. | Pflaumann, U., Duprat, J., Pujol, C. & Labeyrie, L. D. SIMMAX: A modern analog technique to deduce Atlantic sea surface temperatures from planktonic foraminifera in deep-sea sediments. Paleoceanography 11, 1535 (1996) | Article | ISI | |
11. | Healy-Williams, N., Williams, D. F. & Ehrlich, R. Quantifications of morphotypes in Neogloboquadrina pachyderma using Fourier shape analysis. Antarct. J. US 18, 138140 (1984) |
12. | Williams, D. F., Ehrlich, R., Spero, H. J., Healy-Williams, N. & Gary, A. C. Shape and isotopic differences between conspecific foraminiferal morphotypes and resolution of paleoceanographic results. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 64, 153162 (1988) | Article | ISI | ChemPort | |
13. | Cifelli, R. Observations of Globigerina pachyderma (Ehrenberg) and Globigerina incompta Cifelli from the North Atlantic Ocean. J. Foram. Res. 3, 157166 (1973) |
14. | Huber, R., Meggers, H., Baumann, K.-H., Raymo, M. E. & Henrich, R. Shell size variation of the planktonic foraminifer Neogloboquadrina pachyderma sin. in the Norwegian Greenland Sea during the last 1.3 Myrs: Implications for paleoceanographic reconstructions. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 160, 193212 (2000) | Article | ISI | |
15. | Kellogg, T., Duplessy, J. & Shackleton, N. Planktonic foraminiferal and oxygen isotopic stratigraphy and paleoclimatology of Norwegian Sea deep-sea cores. Boreas 7, 6173 (1978) | ISI | |
16. | Jansen, E. The use of stable oxygen and carbon isotope stratigraphy as a dating tool. Quat. Int. 1, 151166 (1989) | Article | |
17. | Bauch, H. A. in Land-ocean Systems in the Siberian Arctic: Dynamics and History (eds Kassens, H. et al.) 601613 (Springer, Berlin, 1999) |
18. | Oppo, D. W., McManus, J. F. & Cullen, J. L. Abrupt climate events 500,000 to 340,000 years ago: Evidence from subpolar North Atlantic sediments. Science 279, 13351338 (1998) | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort | |
19. | McManus, J., Oppo, D. & Cullen, J. A 0.5-million-year record of millennial-scale climate variability in the North Atlantic. Science 283, 971975 (1999) | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort | |
20. | Oppo, D., Keigwin, L. D., McManus, J. F. & Cullen, J. L. Persistent suborbital climate variability in marine isotope stage 5 and Termination II. Paleoceanography 16, 280292 (2001) | Article | ISI | |
21. | Simstich, J. Die ozeanische Deckschicht des Europäischen Nordmeers im Abbild stabiler Isotope von Kalkgehäusen unterschiedlicher Planktonforaminiferenarten. Ber.Rep. Inst. Geowiss., Univ. Kiel 2, 196 (1999) |
22. | Emiliani, C. Pleistocene temperatures. J. Geol. 63, 538578 (1955) | ISI | ChemPort | |
23. | Spero, H. J., Bijma, J., Bemis, B. & Lea, D. Effects of sea water carbonate chemistry on planktonic foraminifera carbon and oxygen isotope values. Nature 390, 497500 (1997) | Article | ISI | ChemPort | |
24. | Bauch, D., Erlenkeuser, H., Winckler, G., Pavlova, G. & Thiede, J. Carbon isotopes and habitat of polar planktic foraminifera in the Okhotsk Sea: The "Carbonate Ion Effect" under natural conditions. Mar. Micropaleontol. 45, 8399 (2002) | Article | ISI | |
25. | de Vargas, C., Renaud, S., Hilbrecht, H. & Pawlowski, J. Pleistocene adaptive radiation in Globorotalia truncatulinoides: Genetic, morphologic, and environmental evidence. Paleobiology 27, 104125 (2001) | ISI | |
26. | Bemis, B. E., Spero, H. J. & Thunell, R. C. Using species-specific paleotemperature equations with foraminifera: A case study in the Southern California Bight. Mar. Micropaleontol. 46, 405430 (2002) | Article | ISI | |
27. | Darling, K. F., Kucera, M., Wade, C. M., von Langen, P. & Pak, D. Seasonal occurrence of genetic types of planktonic foraminiferal morphospecies in the Santa Barbara Channel. Paleoceanography 18, 1032, doi: 10.1029/2001PA000723 (2003) | Article | |
28. | Kandiano, E. S. & Bauch, H. A. Implications of planktic foraminiferal size fractions for the glacial-interglacial paleoceanography of the polar North Atlantic. J. Foram. Res. 32, 245251 (2002) | ISI | |
29. | Bauch, H. A. et al. A multiproxy reconstruction of the evolution of deep and surface waters in the subarctic Nordic seas over the last 30,000 years. Quat. Sci. Rev. 20, 659678 (2001) | Article | ISI | |
Acknowledgements. We thank the crew and scientists of RV Polarstern (ARK XV) for their efforts. Sampling on board was conducted by J. Netzer and E. Stangeew. Part of this work was originally conducted within SFB313, and we thank J. Rumohr for unpublished data. D.B. was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. This work was supported by the NERC and the Leverhulme Trust.
Competing interests statement. The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.